Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

["Nick LaForge" <nicklaforge@gmail.com>]

>> i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in
>> small ARM machines... i could use this
>
> Why not Inferno? (Native or hosted)
>
> uriel
>
>

thanks, i'd overlooked that option

I must say though that having to re-target to limbo is a minus.  Is
there a 'plan9 c' to dis compiler?  The new slew of virtual interfaces
are cool because they are somewhat transparent with respect to the
existing interface; i.e., machine code

in the general case, i'd like a non-linux platform to take plan9 (not
inferno) to more machines

i am not intending to knock inferno.  But does it not seem to have
missed the boat as a unifying platform, and now is more of a niche,
'embedded' solution ?  (Maybe though this was intended all along.)  I
seem more interested today in broadly employing the more general
virtual interfaces such as vx32, lguest, kvm, qemu, etc

nkl