9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Digby Tarvin digbyt@acm.org
Subject: [9fans] (the potential) new release of Plan9, i386 only?
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:40:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000428134049.I88YuqAwjgG83iWcLQzyF0PeenuLX-Ej2BvsefMjnWM@z> (raw)

> Greeitngs,
> 
> After a reading a real downer (it would not get me down if it was not correct :-(
> about Systems Software Research (http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/rob/utah2000.ps)
> I suddenly realised that among the items in the talk was the fact that the (potential)
> next release of plan9 would be x86 only. no more multi platform.
> 
> I have 3 SparcStations and one Macintosh. A x86 only release of Plan9 would be
> quite expensive to me, even if it was given away for nothing...
> 
> Have I misunderstood? Perhaps this was a binary only 4 floppy distro that was mentioned,
> not the real thing?

I quite agree. The PC clones may be cheap and fast, but they are
anything but elegant.

I figure that those people with enough good taste to use Plan9 in
preference to the far more prevalent Microsoft/Apple alternatives
are the same people that are likely to have good taste in hardware
as well.

I could live with a distribution that perhaps only came with Intel
binaries, but at least had the sources and cross compilers to allow
building of systems for other architectures. I have two Sparc2's
which are not fast, but they are nicer to work on and have lasted
much better than Intel machines of similar vintage.

One thing I would like to see added to the Plan9 distribution,
as far as cross platform compatibility is concerned, is PowerPC
support.

Regards,
DigbyT
-- 
Digby R. S. Tarvin                                              digbyt@acm.org
http://www.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk




             reply	other threads:[~2000-04-28 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-04-28 13:40 Digby [this message]
     [not found] <200005041212.IAA12514@cse.psu.edu>
     [not found] ` <200005041257.NAA10332@cthulhu.dircon.co.uk>
     [not found]   ` <39153571.7E975CC3@null.net>
2000-06-09  8:39     ` Tom E Arnold
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-05-08  9:15 Douglas
2000-05-05 16:16 Digby
2000-05-05 15:46 Digby
2000-05-05 13:20 Douglas
2000-05-04 13:55 Digby
2000-05-04 13:18 Digby
2000-05-04 13:17 Digby
2000-05-04 12:57 Digby
2000-05-04 12:23 forsyth
2000-05-04 11:10 Bengt
2000-05-04  9:59 Jolt-Freak
2000-05-04  9:58 Bengt
2000-05-04  9:58 Douglas
2000-04-28 15:27 Digby
2000-04-28 14:21 Digby
2000-04-28 14:15 Digby
2000-04-28 14:11 forsyth
2000-04-28 13:59 Digby
2000-04-28 13:56 Digby
2000-04-28 13:36 Bengt
2000-04-28 13:26 rob
2000-04-28  9:59 Bengt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20000428134049.I88YuqAwjgG83iWcLQzyF0PeenuLX-Ej2BvsefMjnWM@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).