From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
Subject: [9fans] Plan 9 future (Was: Re: Are the Infernospaces gone?)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:28:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000508062821.3AtREwUkH95nm62mAl-cE0Lz0jYUu86MWmexXEgrlVA@z> (raw)
Thanks Rob and Russ.
It seems Plan 9 has been changed in large extent, which makes me interesting
to see its new release. I thought that concurrent programming is very easy
to learn for programming multiple processor systems, and am happy this is
remained in the new release. In addition, threading the now the main stream,
and it is also good for us that we can choose both. ^_^
When I learned Alef, I wondered how they'll combine object oriented
programming to Plan 9 in future. If the threading library in C is the
solution, then what about this?
Kenji
next reply other threads:[~2000-05-08 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-08 6:28 okamoto [this message]
[not found] <200005052042.QAA06869@er7.rutgers.edu>
2000-06-12 10:09 ` Tom E Arnold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-05-10 12:22 rob
2000-05-10 10:17 Lucio
2000-05-10 9:49 Lucio
2000-05-10 8:51 Noel
2000-05-10 8:51 Douglas
2000-05-09 17:53 Alexander
2000-05-09 17:14 Alexander
2000-05-09 17:07 forsyth
2000-05-09 17:05 rob
2000-05-09 16:55 Russ
2000-05-09 16:31 Alexander
2000-05-09 16:18 Alexander
2000-05-09 16:15 rob
2000-05-09 16:10 dhog
2000-05-09 14:46 Alexander
2000-05-09 11:48 forsyth
2000-05-09 8:18 Douglas
2000-05-09 8:18 Ishwar
2000-05-08 20:35 Alexander
2000-05-08 20:11 Roman
2000-05-08 16:12 Russ
2000-05-08 13:45 Lucio
2000-05-08 13:05 Bengt
2000-05-08 12:48 Lucio
2000-05-08 12:09 Leo
2000-05-08 6:56 Bengt
2000-05-08 4:34 Russ
2000-05-08 4:33 rob
2000-05-08 3:55 okamoto
2000-05-06 12:47 Steve
2000-05-06 7:28 Lucio
2000-05-06 7:04 Lucio
2000-05-05 22:00 G.David
2000-05-05 20:53 Scott
2000-05-05 20:42 Anthony
2000-05-05 17:08 Lucio
2000-05-05 16:38 Lucio
2000-05-05 15:32 forsyth
2000-05-05 14:45 Lucio
2000-05-05 14:44 jmk
2000-05-05 14:42 Lucio
2000-05-05 14:20 Lucio
2000-05-05 14:14 Lucio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000508062821.3AtREwUkH95nm62mAl-cE0Lz0jYUu86MWmexXEgrlVA@z \
--to=okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).