From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:56:26 -0700
From: Randolph Fritz <randolph@cyber-dyne.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] SO for plan9?
Message-ID: <20000621105626.D2237@cyber-dyne.com>
References: <200006211516.LAA21321@cse.psu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <200006211516.LAA21321@cse.psu.edu>; from dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com on Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:16:02AM -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c6894dbe-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 11:16:02AM -0400, dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
>
> So basically you want shared libraries to mitigate the effects
> of code bloat?  Why not do away with the code bloat instead?
> This is Plan 9's approach.
>

My program is as memory efficient as possible, yours is big, *theirs*
has "code bloat?" :)

--
Randolph Fritz
Eugene, Oregon, USA