From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com
Message-Id: <200007091455.KAA13396@cse.psu.edu>
Date: Sun,  9 Jul 2000 10:55:49 -0400
To: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] user none
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-dzbivvadxdtflnzppqtixamhxw"
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d64fc354-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-dzbivvadxdtflnzppqtixamhxw
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Off hand, I can't thing of anything that would break.  In security,
less priviledge is always better.  I'll change it on our syystems
and see if it does break anything.

--upas-dzbivvadxdtflnzppqtixamhxw
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Sat Jul  8 19:28:49 EDT 2000
Received: from cse.psu.edu ([130.203.3.50]) by plan9; Sat Jul  8 19:28:48 EDT 2000
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost)
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA06197;
	Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:38 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA06163
	for 9fans-outgoing; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f
Received: from ar.aichi-u.ac.jp (none@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp [202.250.160.40])
	by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA06159
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Message-ID: <20000708224524.281.qmail@nx.aichi-u.ac.jp>
MBOX-Line: From kenji Sun Jul  9 07:45:23 2000
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3J v130.3)
Subject: [9fans] user none
Reply-To: Kenji Arisawa <arisawa@aichi-u.ac.jp>
Sender: owner-9fans@cse.psu.edu
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

I have a question.
In Plan9, we have a rule: "everyone can become none."
However user none plays important role for Internet service.
What's wrong if we replace the rule by the following ?

"Only host owner can become none."

Thanks,

Kenji Arisawa
E-mail: arisawa@aichi-u.ac.jp
--upas-dzbivvadxdtflnzppqtixamhxw--