From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:30:39 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=5B9fans=5D_Re:_R=E9f=2E_:_Re:_=5B9fans=5D_Silly_porting_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?fun_=28RC_for_Unix=29?= Message-ID: <20000718083039.G2260@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <4125691F.003EAEEA.00@SNPAR12.> <20000717032916.A1998@cyber-dyne.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20000717032916.A1998@cyber-dyne.com>; from Randolph Fritz on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 03:29:16AM -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e055978e-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 03:29:16AM -0700, Randolph Fritz wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:21:58PM +0200, boyd.roberts@ca-indosuez.com wrote: > > > > used the unix rc for years; well written, solid as a rock. > > > > I've switched, myself. I rewrote one script in rc and decided it was > time. :) Now if only mk would become standard on Unix... > Amusingly, Linux came out originally with RC as its shell, and that led me to the original Plan 9 papers, and from there to Plan 9. I presume I'm the only one who got here _that_ route!? ++L