From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:45:23 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Missing ARP reply in 9load Message-ID: <20000719194522.H3081@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <200007191610.MAA07608@cse.psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200007191610.MAA07608@cse.psu.edu>; from presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:10:54PM -0400 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e638d346-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:10:54PM -0400, presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > > they aren't options 128 and 129, they're suboptions 128 and 129 in > the vendorinfo option, 0x2b (43). I believe the correct ISC is: > > option-43 80:04:<4 bytes of fs addr>:81:04:<4 bytes of auth server addr>; > > I'm assuming ISC will add the count to this. The format I got to work, eventually, is: option vendor-encapsulated-options 80:04:<4 bytes of fs addr>:81:04:<4 bytes of auth server addr>; Thanks, Rob, for the help. ++L