From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com Message-Id: <200007291656.MAA10280@cse.psu.edu> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 12:55:30 -0400 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] hardware port MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-cjbdntkkuwlmfqnnblhnzaacuf" Topicbox-Message-UUID: edcb2e42-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-cjbdntkkuwlmfqnnblhnzaacuf Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'ld say the mips/carrera port is the easiest to understand. The magnum one used to be but its not on this release. --upas-cjbdntkkuwlmfqnnblhnzaacuf Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Fri Jul 28 21:21:36 EDT 2000 Received: from cse.psu.edu ([130.203.3.50]) by plan9; Fri Jul 28 21:21:35 EDT 2000 Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA29940; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:07:07 -0400 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA29903 for 9fans-outgoing; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:07:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f Received: from aubrey.stanford.edu (aubrey.Stanford.EDU [171.64.31.58]) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA29898 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:06:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200007290106.VAA29898@cse.psu.edu> Received: (qmail 12806 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2000 01:06:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.highwire.org (HELO aubrey.stanford.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.highwire.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2000 01:06:56 -0000 X-url: http://highwire.stanford.edu/~jimr/ X-face: "!ZH^<"U,NeU:732A To: "Plan 9 Mailing List" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: [9fans] hardware port MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <12795.964832815.1@aubrey.stanford.edu> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:06:56 -0700 Sender: owner-9fans@cse.psu.edu Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Precedence: bulk I'm wondering which hardware port of Plan 9 was the most straight-forward, or if there is no such concept? Is there any particular architecture that is recommended for simplicity or elegance? I gather that it isn't the i386 PC. Jim --upas-cjbdntkkuwlmfqnnblhnzaacuf--