From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: forsyth@vitanuova.com Message-Id: <200008020946.FAA18370@cse.psu.edu> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Installing the updates Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:47:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-ikoqqkdgqrhiosdedhlexhaoct" Topicbox-Message-UUID: f2640d0c-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-ikoqqkdgqrhiosdedhlexhaoct Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>We already know that it is non-trivial to port much >>non-Plan9 code to Plan9-native and vice versa. i have found porting well written Unix code to native plan 9 (libc.h, 8[cl] etc) to be straightforward. the main exceptions are socket calls but since those involve deleting lots of ugly lines of code, it's satisfying, and since they mainly involve call setup with the I/O the same read/write after that, it's not too hard. the compilers sometimes pick up old problems that were lurking though. --upas-ikoqqkdgqrhiosdedhlexhaoct Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@vitanuova.com id 965208129:10:25149:26; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:22:09 GMT Received: from claven.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.3.50]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1101070; 2 Aug 2000 9:22 GMT Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA17738; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:21:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:21:34 -0400 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA17678 for 9fans-outgoing; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:21:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f Received: from mercury.bath.ac.uk (exim@mercury.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.81]) by cse.psu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA17671 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 05:21:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from news by mercury.bath.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 13JuZs-0007lX-00 for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:12:40 +0100 Received: from GATEWAY by bath.ac.uk with netnews for 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu) To: cse.psu.edu!9fans Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 09:11:37 GMT Message-ID: <3987E345.4B8F3643@home.com> Organization: @Home Network Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200007311515.LAA18248@cse.psu.edu>, <014501bffbb1$bef147d0$62356887@HWTPC> Reply-To: null.net!DAGwyn Subject: Re: [9fans] Installing the updates Sender: cse.psu.edu!owner-9fans Reply-To: cse.psu.edu!9fans Precedence: bulk > The APE headers do indeed conform. Okay, problem solved. The Plan9 native headers can certainly do whatever Rob and crew think is best. We already know that it is non-trivial to port much non-Plan9 code to Plan9-native and vice versa. --upas-ikoqqkdgqrhiosdedhlexhaoct--