* Re: [9fans] which implementation of an fs is cleanest?
@ 2000-08-04 9:45 forsyth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2000-08-04 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>>I was going to look through ftpfs and / or olefs
olefs uses 9p(2) which might make things easier.
i hope so, because i was about to use 9p(2) myself!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [9fans] which implementation of an fs is cleanest?
2000-08-04 6:15 ` Nick Gorham
@ 2000-08-04 7:19 ` Matt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2000-08-04 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hi,
I'm going to start studying source to implement an fs by mounting a file
(xml in this case)
I was wondering which source code would be the cleanest to study when it
comes to an fs
I was going to look through ftpfs and / or olefs
good places?
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-08-04 9:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-08-04 9:45 [9fans] which implementation of an fs is cleanest? forsyth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-31 14:33 [9fans] database fileservice Stephen Harris
2000-08-04 6:15 ` Nick Gorham
2000-08-04 7:19 ` [9fans] which implementation of an fs is cleanest? Matt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).