From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 08:23:01 +0200 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Solaris thread scheaduling Message-ID: <20000819082301.I4695@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <200008182054.QAA18235@cse.psu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200008182054.QAA18235@cse.psu.edu>; from dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com on Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:53:56PM -0400 Topicbox-Message-UUID: fd6934fc-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:53:56PM -0400, dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > > > Cooperative threads are just coroutines. They're `cooperative' > > because if the thread doesn't cooperate by calling the scheduler, > > no other thread ever get scheduled. > > It's a bit like, "cooperate -- or else!". No, it's more like "those who do not cooperate inherit the cpu". ++L