From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 13:41:03 +0200
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Remote access
Message-ID: <20000821134102.B553@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <200008211108.HAA26556@cse.psu.edu> <20000821132516.A553@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20000821132516.A553@cackle.proxima.alt.za>; from Lucio De Re on Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:25:16PM +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fe0ba58e-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 01:25:16PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
> 
> Nah, vt is broken :-)  Even vt -2.  It is adequate but not for curses
> intensive operations, it doesn't delete lines in the bottom half of
> the screen properly and doesn't clear to end of line either.
> 
I didn't mean to sound ungrateful, by the way.  Vt has improved
dramatically between 2ed and 3ed, but mutt and vi on my NetBSD box
have a real bad time of it.  Good enough out of necessity, but I'm
hoping vncviewer will be much better.

++L