From: bwc@borf.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Kernighan interview (w/ Plan 9 mention)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 09:14:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000906131724.7310A199EB@mail> (raw)
> Its difficult to disagree with these remarks. However, key
> is the nature of the niche(s) that Plan 9 will occupy (aside
> from system's research - its ideas
> are already propagating into other systems).
> Currently, its "popularity" belies its influence (and at this
> stage that is probably a good thing).
I have used Plan 9 for embedded development for five years, and
used sam/mk/9term/9wm longer than that. I think the diverse
nature of small network boxes doing specialized tasks will account
for most of the computing in the future, and I think the plan 9
make a great base for these devices.
Brantley
next reply other threads:[~2000-09-06 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-06 13:14 bwc [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-09-05 13:29 Leo Caves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000906131724.7310A199EB@mail \
--to=bwc@borf.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).