9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ip/ipconfig
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:02:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001026170753.A9304199DC@mail> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]

You must have a fairly different situation.  I always use ipconfig
to start ppp, like now from san diego:

	ip/ipconfig -b115200 ppp /dev/eia000

Part of that may be that every situation I live in uses dhcp to
get everything I need.  Ditto for ethernet ipconfig.  Clearly
I'm missing a lot of people's situations.  I can easily change
ipconfig to use lib/ndb/* or cs to get it's info and only use
dhcp if the former fails of if specificly asked to using a flag.

I can only defend putting dhcp into ipconfig because we don't run
systems standalone at all and that's all ipconfig every does to
get info at our lab.  However, I agree that separating the funcions
might be useful.  If I ever need dhcp for anything other than configuring
IP, I'll probably do it (or someone will probably beat me  to it).

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1599 bytes --]

From: Scott Schwartz <schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ip/ipconfig
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:52:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20001025025225.26800.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu>

| pardon, but does anyone else think that ipconfig maybe should
| figure out the ip stuff all by itself?  these elaborate ipquery
| dances seem a bit tedious.

I agree.  ipconfig does significant magic, but stops short in an
unexpected way.

Also, when launching ppp I find that it's easier to not use ipconfig,
which makes me believe that it needs rethinking.


             reply	other threads:[~2000-10-26 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-10-26 17:02 presotto [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-26  4:02 anothy
2000-10-25  7:34 anothy
2000-10-25 20:30 ` Mark C. Otto
2000-10-25  0:50 baldwin
2000-10-25  2:52 ` Scott Schwartz
2000-10-25  4:52   ` Boyd Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001026170753.A9304199DC@mail \
    --to=presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).