From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ip/ipconfig
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:02:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001026170753.A9304199DC@mail> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 818 bytes --]
You must have a fairly different situation. I always use ipconfig
to start ppp, like now from san diego:
ip/ipconfig -b115200 ppp /dev/eia000
Part of that may be that every situation I live in uses dhcp to
get everything I need. Ditto for ethernet ipconfig. Clearly
I'm missing a lot of people's situations. I can easily change
ipconfig to use lib/ndb/* or cs to get it's info and only use
dhcp if the former fails of if specificly asked to using a flag.
I can only defend putting dhcp into ipconfig because we don't run
systems standalone at all and that's all ipconfig every does to
get info at our lab. However, I agree that separating the funcions
might be useful. If I ever need dhcp for anything other than configuring
IP, I'll probably do it (or someone will probably beat me to it).
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1599 bytes --]
From: Scott Schwartz <schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ip/ipconfig
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:52:25 -0400
Message-ID: <20001025025225.26800.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu>
| pardon, but does anyone else think that ipconfig maybe should
| figure out the ip stuff all by itself? these elaborate ipquery
| dances seem a bit tedious.
I agree. ipconfig does significant magic, but stops short in an
unexpected way.
Also, when launching ppp I find that it's easier to not use ipconfig,
which makes me believe that it needs rethinking.
next reply other threads:[~2000-10-26 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-26 17:02 presotto [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-26 4:02 anothy
2000-10-25 7:34 anothy
2000-10-25 20:30 ` Mark C. Otto
2000-10-25 0:50 baldwin
2000-10-25 2:52 ` Scott Schwartz
2000-10-25 4:52 ` Boyd Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001026170753.A9304199DC@mail \
--to=presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).