From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Some questions...
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010131035018.A3B36199FF@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:50:17 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 556aab9a-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>  While kfs isn't
>the most robust software, it's stable enough for something with a limited

Isn't your kfs residing on scsi HDD but not IDE?

I remind now that I had no such trouble on kfs when I met this new release
first time.  I compiled fileserver, auth server kernel on the machine with 48MB
ram using kfs local filesystem.  Only difference between that and present 
notebook is that the notebook uses IDE disk, however, the machine last year 
used scsi (sd53c8xx) local disk.  I may be wrong though, because I didn't use 
kfs so efficiently at that time.

Kenji