From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Some questions... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-wcpohkbucbcfwmkrtankjdobkg" Message-Id: <20010131142043.EA10819A18@mail.cse.psu.edu> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:20:42 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 55a488c4-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-wcpohkbucbcfwmkrtankjdobkg Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No, all of our stand alone systems have IDE drives. We just don't do that much writing to the disks, only log traffic, and the UPS's make sure the system doesn't get shut off in surprising ways. Our auth server has been up since Dec 1, which is when I took it down to put a new kernel on it. I'm not pretending that kfs is robust, just that it is sufficient in this situation, i.e, as a pretty much read only fs. I do use it for weeks at a time on my laptop when travelling, but I've never used it as a real production system. It was originally cloned from a much older version of our file server code and though we fix bugs when we experience them, we don't work it hard enough to experience many of them. --upas-wcpohkbucbcfwmkrtankjdobkg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Jan 30 22:51:26 EST 2001 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Jan 30 22:51:25 EST 2001 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4899D19A07; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:51:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.91.52]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id A3B36199FF for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:50:18 -0500 (EST) To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Some questions... From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010131035018.A3B36199FF@mail.cse.psu.edu> Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:50:17 0900 > While kfs isn't >the most robust software, it's stable enough for something with a limited Isn't your kfs residing on scsi HDD but not IDE? I remind now that I had no such trouble on kfs when I met this new release first time. I compiled fileserver, auth server kernel on the machine with 48MB ram using kfs local filesystem. Only difference between that and present notebook is that the notebook uses IDE disk, however, the machine last year used scsi (sd53c8xx) local disk. I may be wrong though, because I didn't use kfs so efficiently at that time. Kenji --upas-wcpohkbucbcfwmkrtankjdobkg--