From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] psutils et al
From: rog@vitanuova.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010215163234.4BD74199D7@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:37:12 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 663d33d4-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Er, yes.  I wasn't very clear: Wouldn't it be cleaner for the
> document-relative orientation of the bitmaps produced by the driver to
> be consistent, and for successive changes to the orientation of the
> page to be handled entirely within "page"?

yes.
however...

> I don't think the efficiency case is all that clear cut, either --
> pages can take a very long time to render from scratch.

if you just have page tell ghostscript to render it the right way the
first time (which it can do if it looks at the PageOrientation header)
then it'll take exactly the same time as before. (important if you've
got a whole document in landscape mode)

i hadn't imagined a "flip" option to the page menu, just that it should
get it right first time.  (if the postscript header is wrong, it can
always be inserted manually - but that's an issue for the creator of
the broken postscript, not for page)

  cheers,
    rog.