From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: Re [9fans] union directories From: paurea@it.uc3m.es MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-vmtxzrjdjnbmfybmffgaoxbeia" Message-Id: <20010322154131.D102F199EB@mail.cse.psu.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:41:27 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 732ff11c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-vmtxzrjdjnbmfybmffgaoxbeia Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Not really. You can always do: (I am writing what I think it should do, not what it actual behaviour..) bind -ac foo bar *bar foo bind -b foo bar foo *bar Saludos, Gorka --upas-vmtxzrjdjnbmfybmffgaoxbeia Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from perete.dei.inf.uc3m.es (perete.dei.inf.uc3m.es [163.117.137.166]) by arpa.it.uc3m.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23793 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:37:30 +0100 Received: by perete.dei.inf.uc3m.es (Postfix) id C828728F9; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:37:29 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: paurea@dei.inf.uc3m.es Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by perete.dei.inf.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E1928F8 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:37:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.6.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9837C199F8; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:37:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com (ampl.com [204.178.31.2]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id 40740199EE for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:36:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Russ Cox" To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: Re [9fans] union directories MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010322153635.40740199EE@mail.cse.psu.edu> Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:36:28 -0500 The directory which is before for the lookup gets the creation. I feel that is more consistent. If it is before, it is before for everything... If you want that, you can do that: use -c with all your binds and the create will go to the top directory. There are legitimate cases in which you want creates to go to the bottom directory, though; your scheme would disallow that. Russ --upas-vmtxzrjdjnbmfybmffgaoxbeia--