From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200104092331.AAA05616@localhost.localdomain>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] micro vs monolithic kernels
In-Reply-To: Message from "John A. Murdie" <john@cs.york.ac.uk>
   of "Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:33:15 BST." <E14mcjJ-0001Aj-00@minster.cs.york.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Steve Kilbane <steve@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:31:55 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7c8dadc6-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

The impression I've had is that the architecture of the system was
what was interesting: 9P, namespaces and union directories. The manner
of implementation seemed to be of far less interest.

"The presentation centers on the data structures, because that is how the
program was designed, and because the algorithms are easy to provide, given
the right data structures."
	-rob, from the Sam paper.

steve