From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <200104282228.SAA08771@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] the declaration of main()
In-Reply-To: <20010428180016.D91AC199ED@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Cc:
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 18:28:02 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 963cb2b2-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <20010428180016.D91AC199ED@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>
>  [...]
>

Oops, sorry, I should have used better grammar.  :-)  By saying, ``I
think that might be a good thing,'' I meant, ``it's a good thing that
you cannot mix and match between Plan 9 and the APE.''

Doing so is fraught with the problems which Charles and others have
mentioned, *plus* leads to programs which aren't really portable back
to Unix/POSIX.  In that respect, it's better to keep them seperate.

	- Dan C.