Re: Re[2]: [9fans] hehe bad to worse

[presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 542 bytes --]

If you've managed to do all the wraps in order, nothing has to
be changed.

I made two mistakes in the last wrap that canceled each other out:

- port/segment.h should have been removed
- portmkfile should have been fixed to not have segment.$O depend
  on it any more

I didn't put either in so following the wraps, things should
continue to compile OK, albeit with a file that doesn't need to be there.
It could confuse someone that changes segment.h and then notices that the
change doesn't make it into the resulting kernel.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2848 bytes --]

From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [9fans] hehe bad to worse
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 19:47:05 +0200
Message-ID: <200105101747.TAA25135@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl>

Now I'm slightly confused. My /sys/src/9/port/portmkfile contains

	segment.$O: ../port/segment.h

This is the line that is to be deleted, I assume, or???
	
For the record, AFAIK I succesfully applied both wraps, and succeeded
to remake everything, including kernels.

Axel.

> my fault, I should have put a new port/portmkfile in the last wrap.
> Just remove the 
> 
> 	segment.$O:	segment.h
> 
> line from portmkfile, segment.h is history, its contents are in segment.c.