From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <200106111519.LAA28218@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
In-Reply-To: <041601c0f10d$72dabaa0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
References: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10106091142400.619-100000@irixbum.ca>
Cc: 
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:19:58 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b46c91a8-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <041601c0f10d$72dabaa0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA> you write:
>i don't think i'd go so far to call it a science -- more like an art.

Okay, this is getting way off topic for 9fans, but, let me ask
this: at the real abstract, pure level, is science any different
at all from art?  I contend that they're one and the same.

	- Dan C.