* Re: [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release
@ 2001-06-20 9:28 presotto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: presotto @ 2001-06-20 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 37 bytes --]
definitely 9p2000, maybe the new fs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1430 bytes --]
From: F.J.Ballesteros <nemo@gsyc.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:47:21 +0200
Message-ID: <20010620063628.9D22A199C1@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Hi,
I was just wondering if what I suppose
will be the next full release is likely to include
both 9p2000 and the terminal/cpu kernel adapted
to work as a fs kernel; or is it likely to
include 9p2000 but not the fs stuff?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release
2001-06-20 9:56 jmk
@ 2001-06-21 13:07 ` Barry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Barry @ 2001-06-21 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>
> I was just wondering if what I suppose
> will be the next full release is likely to include
> both 9p2000 and the terminal/cpu kernel adapted
> to work as a fs kernel; or is it likely to
> include 9p2000 but not the fs stuff?
>
(Reply to Message Above)
>
>by then it'll be 9p3000...
>
Uh.... So, there's going to be 9pME (Millenium Edition) ?
Did Bill buy most of the stock of some computer/communications
research corporation that we know ?
==================================================================
Once a proud programmer of Apple II computers, he now spends his days
and nights in cheap dives fraternizing with exotic dancers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release
@ 2001-06-20 9:56 jmk
2001-06-21 13:07 ` Barry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2001-06-20 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Wed Jun 20 02:37:31 EDT 2001, nemo@gsyc.escet.urjc.es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering if what I suppose
> will be the next full release is likely to include
> both 9p2000 and the terminal/cpu kernel adapted
> to work as a fs kernel; or is it likely to
> include 9p2000 but not the fs stuff?
>
by then it'll be 9p3000...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release
@ 2001-06-20 6:47 F.J.Ballesteros
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: F.J.Ballesteros @ 2001-06-20 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hi,
I was just wondering if what I suppose
will be the next full release is likely to include
both 9p2000 and the terminal/cpu kernel adapted
to work as a fs kernel; or is it likely to
include 9p2000 but not the fs stuff?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-06-21 13:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-20 9:28 [9fans] curious about a 9p2000 release presotto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-20 9:56 jmk
2001-06-21 13:07 ` Barry
2001-06-20 6:47 F.J.Ballesteros
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).