From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Cross Message-Id: <200106250341.XAA29992@augusta.math.psu.edu> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] sam vs acme In-Reply-To: <20010624223334.5371.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu> References: Cc: Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:41:45 -0400 Topicbox-Message-UUID: bf23b43c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 In article <20010624223334.5371.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu> you write: >| would anyone recommend using 'sam' as the editor of choice for p9? > >It's not bad. Sometimes acme is better, but I don't mind using both. >(Except that plumbing can get confused.) It would be nice to see acme's underlying fileserver architecture decoupled from its user interface. That would result in something roughly analogous to the way that XEDIT worked under VM in the IBM mainframe universe, as Scott has made comments about in the past. - Dan C.