From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3ciscupdate v148.2.1)
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] exportfs
Message-Id: <20010710003248.E43181998A@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:41:37 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c437f5c8-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Hello 9fans,

>>Maybe the best approach is an ro-fs that you mount first, and then
>>exportfs?  Is that more modular, or just more work?
>
>I like that better, because I think it's more generalized, and can
>thus apply to things other than exportfs, as well (consider what
you
>mentioned about the http server).

OK, I agreed to it on the whole.
But we have already srvfs, so the the option "everything under /foo
is read only" may be suitable to it.

Kenji Arisawa
E-mail: arisawa@aichi-u.ac.jp