From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lucio De Re To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] General question about hosted interfaces Message-ID: <20010710200948.J22003@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <3B4B13AF.6336FDA6@null.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3B4B13AF.6336FDA6@null.net>; from Douglas A. Gwyn on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:17:57PM +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:09:49 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: c4bba602-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 03:17:57PM +0000, Douglas A. Gwyn wrote: > > What is it, apart from someone having to do the work, that would prevent > the above-device-level portion of Plan 9, perhaps Inferno's emu, running > on top of a UNIX system (or even Windows, gasp), with the hosted-Plan-9 > first importing the UNIX /-rooted file system globally then overlay- > mounting the hosted-Plan-9 specific parts of the name space? I.e. true > rio, acme, etc. for people who are not in a position to control the > choice of operating system. > Isn't that largely what drawterm does? > I know that would introduce inefficiencies in the data paths, but that > is not necessarily a fatal problem. Oh, yes, it does! :-) Funny, I'd like it the other way: have all the nice features of the Plan 9 infrastructure and throw the ugly Unix toys above it, simply because they exist, and people are so used to them, they don't realise they can live without them. Like Doom (or is it Quake?), Word, Netscape, to name a few. ++L