From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] more bad news from Lucent
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:26:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200107111826.OAA24712@augusta.math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010711163218.3205E199C0@mail.cse.psu.edu>
In article <20010711163218.3205E199C0@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>'Beleagured'? Over here the phrase which is always trotted out is
> struggling telecoms manufacturer Lucent
>Is there a word for this association of words? We see such inseparable
>phrases all the time, e.g.
> upstart chip maker Transmeta
> former Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega
New (e-conomy) speak? The voice of a new iGeneration? Market Speak?
Management speak? Industry Trade Rag Speak?
I know, Jim, on a related note I sense an issue coming on, but I
don't have the bandwidth to address it right now. Perhaps you and
some of your e-colleagues could take it offline and whiteboard an
e-solution strategized from your e-xpertize? The ROI would be
visionary. You know, make it an action item to e-vigorate your
linguistic service i-offerings? And don't forget, use XML!
BOSS: Everything we do must revolve around XML. XML is the
light and the way. It is the future of E-Commerce. We
will use it to revitalize our deliverables.... Hey, mister,
just where do you think you're going? Let me see your
DTD!
DRONE: But, I'm just going to the bathroom....
BOSS: No excuse! Everything we do revolves around XML! Now let
me see a DTD.
DRONE: But....But, I just have to pee....
BOSS: Pee Shmee! Again, no excuse! No DTD, no pee-pee.
DRONE: (Starts crying)
BOSS: You see, people, in the New Economy, some of us are tougher
than others. We can't tolerate the weaklings if we're to
syngerize our core competencies around unleashing frictionless
deliverables. Anyone else have to pee?
We now return you to your regularly scheduled Ed Woods movies....
- Dan C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-11 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-11 16:32 jmk
2001-07-11 17:40 ` Theo Honohan
2001-07-11 18:26 ` Dan Cross [this message]
2001-07-11 22:25 ` Jason Gurtz
2001-07-11 18:36 ` Quinn Dunkan
2001-07-11 18:45 ` chad
2001-07-12 0:07 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-16 8:55 ` Toby Thain
2001-07-16 9:40 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-15 9:12 ` Zebedee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-11 10:54 [9fans] General question about hosted interfaces forsyth
2001-07-11 10:58 ` Lucio De Re
2001-07-11 12:56 ` [9fans] more bad news from Lucent Matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200107111826.OAA24712@augusta.math.psu.edu \
--to=cross@math.psu.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).