From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200107191500.f6JF0p117188@highwire.stanford.edu>
From: "James A. Robinson" <jim.robinson@stanford.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [9fans] sam vs acme
In-reply-to: Message from steve.simon@snellwilcox.com
   of "Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:39:19 BST."References: <3796700714@snellwilcox.com>
 <3796700714@snellwilcox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <17183.995554851.1@highwire.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:00:51 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d1024c7c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I only wish the Windows version understood sam -r...

Is it because of a lack of rsh?  Because one of the things I do
with sam is tweak it to use ssh instead. I imagine the same could
be done easily enough with the windows version.

There isn't anything about the underlying structure of sam -r that
would fail under windows right?  From what I remember of the book
Rob co-authored (Practice of Programming) they talk a lot about how
to get around things like endian problems.

Jim