From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <200107311755.NAA15973@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] C++ compiler anyone?
In-Reply-To: <20010731160942.224A719A04@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Cc:
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:55:31 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d8237c9c-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <20010731160942.224A719A04@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>> does anyone have a functional C++ compiler for Release 3?
>
>Functional C++?  As though C++ were missing the kitchen
>sink.  Can't you guys just stick with Scheme or ML?

Err, I think that's ``functional'' as in ``working'' not as
in functional programming.  The idea of functional C++ is...
scary.  But there's always ocaml....

	- Dan C.

(ps- has anyone worked on getting HUGS or GHC working under
Plan 9?  Has anyone ever wondered why there's not an FPL called
Curry?)