From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <200108151802.OAA07802@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Oooops...where is ls -R gone?
In-Reply-To: <015401c125ad$45ed3cf0$3cf7c6d4@SOMA>
References: <cej-1010808101702.A01440@cejchan.gli.cas.cz>
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:02:15 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: de09cf44-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <015401c125ad$45ed3cf0$3cf7c6d4@SOMA> you write:
>kinda weird how find(1) got deprecated.  like dd(1), the options
>were ghastly, but it got the job done.

You're joking, right?

There was no find in research Unix, AFAIK, but I never used it directly
(except older PDP-11 versions on emulators).  find(1) is too limited; you
have everything you need with du and the shell.

Hmm...  In terms of Unix, it would be nice if something >7th ed could
make it's way out of Bell Labs.  I think at this point, it'd be more for
historical or academic interest than anything else.  I wonder what SCO
would have to say about the issue?

	- Dan C.