From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Hohensee <humbubba@smarty.smart.net>
Message-Id: <200108291340.JAA02770@smarty.smart.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] EROS, Vapour
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
In-Reply-To: <3b87fb54@news.bezeqint.net> from "Eyal Lotem" at Aug 29, 2001 09:04:29 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:40:28 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e739b804-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> 
> How do you think Plan9 compares to the Eros (www.eros-os.org) and Vapour () 
> designs?
> Do you think the increased backwards compatability of Plan9 is worth the 
> lack of advantages such as a pure capability system, orthogonal 
> persistence, and in the case of Vapour, extreme performance and utter 
> safety?
> 

mirror(Eyal Lotem) = motel laye.

Vapour is vapour, last I heard. It's based on a trusted compiler as
well. I don't trust compilers. 

EROS is pretty neat, and actually exists. Shapiro said C++ was a mistake.

Rick Hohensee
x86 compembler in Bash
ftp://linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim/osimpa.tgz