From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 versus CORBA?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-ikvwcpbxihuvqsjmtcfsaphvjf"
Message-Id: <20010926013413.BC15D1998A@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:34:10 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f3841398-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-ikvwcpbxihuvqsjmtcfsaphvjf
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I wouldn't get rid of none.  I still like the idea of running
the listener and services that don't need more access as none.
In fact, we continually reduce the power of none to make it
less dangerous.

--upas-ikvwcpbxihuvqsjmtcfsaphvjf
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Tue Sep 25 21:26:31 EDT 2001
Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Sep 25 21:26:30 EDT 2001
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.16.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 7A3DE19A02; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:26:12 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.101.69])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id 68EAE1998A
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 versus CORBA?
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010926012552.68EAE1998A@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:26:22 +0900

Thanks Presotto for your elaborated message.

>   export the server to machines you CPU to so that you don't have to
>   depend on the current 'speaks for' relation if you don't want to.

Does this mean we can eliminate 'none' user from Plan 9 system?
I don't like that user, although he is not spade ace. :-)

Kenji

--upas-ikvwcpbxihuvqsjmtcfsaphvjf--