From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] C compiler question: initializer is not a constant
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:31:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110011331.PAA05411@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1256 bytes --]
Last week I ported some code containing an
initialization like one of h in attached test.c:
struct {
int a, b, c;
} x;
int h = (int)&x.b - (int)&x;
The plan 9 C compilers (pcc -c, 8c) complain about it:
test.c:8[stdin:9] initializer is not a constant: h
The author of the code told me that it is accepted by
``all other C compilers except ...''
(and I think the exception named was the irix compiler).
Are the plan 9 C compilers more strict here?
In ``the C programming language'' (2nd edition)
I found on page 209, near the end of A7.19:
"Initializers must evaluate either to a constant or to the
address of a previously declared external or static object
plus or minus a constant."
Is this the rule that applies?
I tried some variants, like g:
int g = (int)(&x.b - (int)&x);
and the plan 9 C compilers also complain here (same error msg).
However, gcc (2.95.3) and sun cc (Sun WorkShop 6 2000/04/07 C 5.1)
do not complain about h, but they do complain about g:
(gcc) /tmp/test.c:8: initializer element is not computable at load time
(sun cc) "/tmp/test.c", line 8: an address is not allowed in a constant
initializer for an integral type whose size is smaller than the
size of a pointer
Axel.
[-- Attachment #2: test.c --]
[-- Type: text/plain , Size: 175 bytes --]
struct {
int a, b, c;
} x;
int d = (int)&x;
int e = (int)&x.b;
int f = (int)(&x.b - 1);
int g = (int)(&x.b - (int)&x);
int h = (int)&x.b - (int)&x;
main(){
}
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-01 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-01 13:31 Axel Belinfante [this message]
2001-10-01 15:35 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-01 16:20 ` Axel Belinfante
2001-10-02 8:25 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-01 13:35 David Gordon Hogan
2001-10-01 13:47 ` Axel Belinfante
2001-10-01 13:40 rob pike
2001-10-01 13:55 ` Axel Belinfante
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110011331.PAA05411@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl \
--to=axel.belinfante@cs.utwente.nl \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).