From: nigel@9fs.org
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] capability-based design (Re: permissions idea)
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 06:31:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011005053113.DF809199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]
>> also, EROS's GPLed. I do not say that is an improvement, but
>> a GPLed OS has done very well lately in popularity.
This is a bit self-fulfilling isn't it? How many GPL'ed OSes are there
thay haven't become popular? We don't know, because they haven't
become popular enough to get publicised.
I'm off to look for elephants with red toenails in cherry trees.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1893 bytes --]
From: Richard <greon@best.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] capability-based design (Re: permissions idea)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:57:15 -0700
Message-ID: <E15pJvL-0002PD-00@localhost>
forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk writes:
>in what way(s) do "capa" and eros improve on
>(say) CAP or ten15?
let me append to my response.
past capa systems suffered from poor performance, I understand. EROS's
designer thinks he can solve that problem, so that EROS's performance on
common tasks will approximate that of mainstream OSes. I do not
understand most of what this guy says.
also, EROS's GPLed. I do not say that is an improvement, but
a GPLed OS has done very well lately in popularity.
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-05 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-05 5:31 nigel [this message]
2001-10-05 7:40 ` Richard
2001-10-08 9:36 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 2:06 okamoto
2001-10-08 18:16 Sape Mullender
2001-10-08 18:18 ` Lucio De Re
2001-10-05 17:12 Russ Cox
2001-10-05 8:13 nigel
2001-10-05 16:44 ` Richard
2001-10-05 4:00 okamoto
2001-10-08 16:53 ` Maarit Maliniemi
2001-10-04 23:57 Richard
2001-10-04 21:59 forsyth
2001-10-04 23:29 ` Richard
2001-10-04 19:28 rog
2001-10-04 20:27 ` Richard
2001-10-04 20:33 ` Richard
2001-09-28 1:06 [9fans] on the topic of viruses dmr
2001-10-01 16:13 ` permissions idea (Re: [9fans] on the topic of viruses) Matthew Hannigan
2001-10-02 8:34 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-04 18:36 ` [9fans] capability-based design (Re: permissions idea) Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011005053113.DF809199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu \
--to=nigel@9fs.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).