From: bwc@borf.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] correcting old failures, and NJ vs MA
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 17:51:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011009214934.C64C419A0A@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)
I'm amazed at how long the ``ITS is better than CTSS'' debate can survive.
Would we be having this thread if undergrads at MIT were allowed more access
to CTSS accounts?
Brantley
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 21:51 bwc [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-11 11:39 forsyth
2001-10-10 13:04 presotto
2001-10-11 9:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-11 14:29 ` david presotto
2001-10-11 15:26 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-11 15:54 ` andrey mirtchovski
2001-10-09 21:44 forsyth
2001-10-09 17:43 anothy
2001-10-10 8:56 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-10 9:16 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-11 4:27 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-11 9:11 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011009214934.C64C419A0A@mail.cse.psu.edu \
--to=bwc@borf.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).