From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Browsers (was: Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)) 
From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20011011113820.6ED6919A61@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:41:20 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 065da678-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>Perhaps someone in the Plan 9 world has implemented a `browser' for a
>>`web' document description language in Plan 9 style. There's no reason
>>why the Plan 9 form of innovation (step back, think, redesign and
>>rewrite) should not be applied to the Web, is there?

no, but i don't see wide-spread adoption as being particularly great,
so it's probably not worthwhile.  it's one reason that W3C and XML mania worries me.
a proper pandora's box.