From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: anothy@cosym.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20011015042244.8C8CE19A19@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] Re: Plan 9 annoyances
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:21:53 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0852dfb6-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

// i see no real reason for "mk nuke" to exist.

i find there to be a useful distinction between these two:
	"blow away all the intermediate files generated from a mk here"
	"blow away _everything_ generated from a mk here"
i generally don't want 'mk clean' to blow away 8.out (although it does
in some places), but it's useful to have a command to get back to a
"pristine" state.

having 'mk nuke' blow away an installed libap.a does seem wrong,
although the building of libraries is sort of odd. i'd still be inclined to
change that.
ア	(i recently got ktrans working - thanks kenji - and am very
	excited about it!)