From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] What makes Plan 9 unique? From: forsyth@vitanuova.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-toocqoaqtxeuukkrkdvwjckcmd" Message-Id: <20011026170416.55FB219A08@mail.cse.psu.edu> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:09:30 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0ebd7fe6-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-toocqoaqtxeuukkrkdvwjckcmd Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit the implementation probably is fairly easy, and i suspect that's all that russ referred to. knowing what to implement is another matter entirely, and that's probably why it hasn't been done. --upas-toocqoaqtxeuukkrkdvwjckcmd Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@vitanuova.com id 1004115540:10:19109:2; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:59:00 GMT Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1017796; 26 Oct 2001 16:58 GMT Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.20.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8EE7619A59; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:54:11 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from mercury.bath.ac.uk (mercury.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.81]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B559719A58 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:53:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from news by mercury.bath.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15xAAH-0005Lj-00 for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:49:01 +0100 Received: from GATEWAY by bath.ac.uk with netnews for 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu) To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Message-ID: <87adye1heb.fsf@becket.becket.net> Organization: University of California, Irvine Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <20011026150129.5B63E199F8@mail.cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] What makes Plan 9 unique? Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:48:50 GMT rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com (Russ Cox) writes: > But since the interface is entirely separate, it would be easy to > write interactive support for the terminal (a la screens), without > shells and other programs needing to know. "It would be easy to..." is always a weak argument. Blind people are here today, using GNU/Linux systems with alacrity. Why is a suitable Plan 9 interface not available, if it's so easy? I suspect it would actually take a bit of work. Thomas --upas-toocqoaqtxeuukkrkdvwjckcmd--