From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com>
Message-Id: <200111051551.fA5Fp9o28322@skeeve.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Plan9 and Ada95?
In-Reply-To: <20011105143517.77FB0199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Cc:
Date: Mon,  5 Nov 2001 17:51:09 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 14722982-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>GNAT would probably come fairly cheaply once we had a port of GCC 3.0.

Actually not.  GNAT is written in Ada, and thus there would need to
be a cross-compilation boostrap done at some point.

And don't forget the Ada runtime (threading) stuff.  I've no idea
how well it does/doesn't map to Plan 9.

Arnold