From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9
From: "rob pike" <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20011106133359.19311199BF@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Tue,  6 Nov 2001 08:33:56 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 162beef2-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I'm not suggesting a change in Plan 9; I'm thinking about file system
> name spaces in general, and thinking that the per-process variability
> of Plan 9 is great, but I think it could be taken even further; in
> that way unifying all the different kinds of links there are.

To what effect?  You've yet to ponit out a problem or limitation introduced
by the way Plan 9 does this.  It's one thing to say things could be different;
it's quite another to make a convincing argument why it's worthwhile.

-rob