From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200111122024.UAA13976@localhost.localdomain>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] one reason ideas from Plan 9 didn't catch on
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:42:25 GMT."
             <a3db6b24.0111111248.6c892bdd@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Steve Kilbane <steve@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:24:16 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1fe01dec-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I've a sneaking suspicion - entirely without evidence - that the
actual contents of the licence are less significant than the impact
of zealots raving about it. If people read the licence for themselves,
and then decide it's not for them, then fine. Though I'd suggest that
the available papers are an even more rewarding read.

steve