From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] dhog the corruptor!
From: David Gordon Hogan <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="upas-fhztynhctidxhjkibplhdtxonx"
Message-Id: <20011113223247.90C59199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:32:34 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 21701fa4-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--upas-fhztynhctidxhjkibplhdtxonx
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Brucee did the implementation of dynamically loaded
drivers.  I'm just tidying up a bit and making it more
generic.


--upas-fhztynhctidxhjkibplhdtxonx
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Tue Nov 13 17:10:22 EST 2001
Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.8.6])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP
	id 0E322199E7; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:10:10 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Received: from cosym.net (peter.sys.9srv.net [64.7.3.116])
	by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id D03D4199E4
	for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:09:35 -0500 (EST)
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: anothy@cosym.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20011113220935.D03D4199E4@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Subject: [9fans] dhog the corruptor!
Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu
X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
List-Help: <mailto:9fans-request@cse.psu.edu?subject=help>
List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu>
List-Archive: <http://lists.cse.psu.edu/archives/9fans/>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:09:21 -0500

// Dhog is putting in dynamicly linked drivers...

waitaminute... the same guy's "giving" plan 9 gcc
_and_ dynamicly linked drivers? whoa. aside from
the amount of potentially painful work each
involves, i find it interesting that these two largish
departures from "old-school" plan 9 come from
the same place.

i'm (mostly) kidding. i'm still torn on gcc, but i
like dynamic drivers, at least in theory. getting the
implementation right's another thing...
ア

--upas-fhztynhctidxhjkibplhdtxonx--