From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
Message-Id: <200111212012.PAA22337@augusta.math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Private Namespaces for Linux
In-Reply-To: <20011121145219.5E53D199E7@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:12:51 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2701b644-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

In article <20011121145219.5E53D199E7@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>server = PentiumII/Xeon 400
>client = PentiumPro 199
>network = 100 mbs ether
>
>test =
>	import {tcp|il}!olive / /tmp
>	cd /tmp/386/bin; cat * > /dev/null
>
>the remote fs protocol is 9P2000
>
>I did a few runs to warm up the cache on the
>server and 7 runs each for IL and TCP interleaved.
>The timings came out just about the same for
>Il and TCP, 29.17 and 29.38 secs respectively.
>The difference was well within the error bars.

Wow....  Okay, that answers my question.

	- Dan C.