From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Nagle algorithm
From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20011127112836.B0621199D7@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:28:32 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2b3306d2-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>nagle delay will do sod all.   as the rfc defines it, it isn't invoked,

sorry, that got posted before i could add this: ``provided the data continues
to arrive in a timely way, as is normal, because the MSS is often
not an exact multiple of the block size''.  actually monitoring various
protocols here i don't see much of a problem.