From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] moscow ml From: forsyth@vitanuova.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-auuufespxgxbmvhhfittpbjonc" Message-Id: <20011206160815.0D3CA199FA@mail.cse.psu.edu> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:14:47 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3026d074-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-auuufespxgxbmvhhfittpbjonc Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i suspect it's one of the new system calls, or rather, the new version of an old call (stat). --upas-auuufespxgxbmvhhfittpbjonc Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from punt-1.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@vitanuova.com id 1007654362:10:25954:1; Thu, 06 Dec 2001 15:59:22 GMT Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by punt-1.mail.demon.net id aa1109133; 6 Dec 2001 15:56 GMT Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.16.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id ECF76199ED; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:55:05 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from cosym.net (peter.sys.9srv.net [64.7.3.116]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id 0D99F199BB for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:54:35 -0500 (EST) To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] moscow ml MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20011206155435.0D99F199BB@mail.cse.psu.edu> Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.7 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Help: List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:54:27 -0500 thanks, russ, but as you can see, my results are somewhat different: % cat hello.sml val _ = print "hello world\n"; % mosmlc hello.sml camlrunm 11329: bad sys call number 42 pc 18d1a camlrunm 11329: suicide: sys: bad sys call pc=0x00018d1a % i havn't installed the Dec4 or Nov22 updates yet; are they required? seems unlikely, given the description on the web pages. mk'ing from scratch doesn't work, either, since the camlrunm and mosmlyac binaries fail for similar syscall reasons, and the mkfiles don't know how to rebuild them. i've not attached a debugger, but my sys.h dosn't have a syscall #42 (if i'm reading that error right). while we're on the question of what updates are required for what, i'd like to say i _really_ like the inclusin of a list of changes, as found with the Apr25-Jun5 packages. can we get more of that? --upas-auuufespxgxbmvhhfittpbjonc--