From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Snader <jsnader@ix.netcom.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Plan9 Programming languages ! -- PASCAL?
Message-ID: <20020102062206.A60487@ix.netcom.com>
References: <9uo884$d2j$8@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>, <9usvhq$kcq$8@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net> <3C23EA53.BC3FBFD9@jps.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3C23EA53.BC3FBFD9@jps.net>; from chaotrope@jps.net on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:04:58AM +0000
Date: Wed,  2 Jan 2002 06:22:06 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3aef3b04-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:04:58AM +0000, kim kubik wrote:
> D De Villiers wrote:
> >
> > No Pascal implementation ? Pascal compiler etc etc ?
> >
>
> My (admittedly weak) memory is that there existed
> at one time a very short tome entitled something
> like "Why Pascal Is Not My Favorite Programming
> Language" and was part of the Bell Labs Technical
> Reports.
>

http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cstr/100.ps.gz

Jon Snader