From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <200202221255.g1MCt3q02259@copernicus.cs.utwente.nl>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs config problem: accidental config deletion?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:37:58."
             <20020222122536.A643419A6E@mail.cse.psu.edu> 
References: <20020222122536.A643419A6E@mail.cse.psu.edu> 
From: Axel Belinfante <Axel.Belinfante@cs.utwente.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:03 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 53f7456a-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Thanks for the reply.
Will I get feedback that tells me when I guessed the
filsys string wrong?
The reason I'm asking is that I know how I configured
the fake-worm part of main, but am a bit unsure about
the cache part, that is on another disk that also
contains an empty other file-system.
Because I made a dump before switching the system off,
I don't care much about the cache nor about the (empty)
other file system, assuming that I can use 'recover main'
to reinitialise the cache.

Yes, avoiding not-intented ream is very important.
(Seemingly) a long time ago with disk/kfs I included a 
not-intended ream request, when I copied/pasted a
disk/kfs command from the man page without paying
attention to _all_ the options (i.e. overseeing the 'r' option);
luckily that was a very fresh file system,
just after installation -- it just took me time to
reinstall.

Axel.

> the configuration is stored where you tell it,
> and as you say, giving a new "config" command
> causes it to reset the configuration.
> you need to give it the filsys lines as before.
> DO NOT INCLUDE a ream request, or you WILL be sad.
> just the filsys