From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: splite@purdue.edu
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9/linux/fbsd compiler shootout
Message-ID: <20020226130057.A8122@sigint.cs.purdue.edu>
References: <20020226150031.A2A4B19A1C@mail.cse.psu.edu> <a5g9o8$t0i$1@yorikke.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a5g9o8$t0i$1@yorikke.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>; from wb@vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de on Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:02:05PM +0000
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:00:57 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 571eeedc-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:02:05PM +0000, Wilhelm B. Kloke wrote:
> 
> (in fact, [gcc] 2.96 was never recommended for use and made it into some
> Linux distributions only accidentally.)

OT, but this isn't true.  2.96 is a Red Hat creation and they swear by it.
Everyone else swears at it.