From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] GUI toolkit for Plan 9
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020227104607.CA57F19A9D@mail.cse.psu.edu> (raw)
: But that's only an argument against adding gobs of hairy optimization
: to 8c; it's not an argument for why GCC is somehow *bad* for having
: such optimizations. Indeed, it's really an argument for why dropping
Once good thing of 8c/8l as they are today is that it's far more easy to
port them that it is to port gcc. IMHO, this is mostly due to the fact that
they are quite simple. So, I'd consider the complexity increase of 8c as
a thing to consider before actually `improving' it. If it gets a bit better
but the price to pay is to make it less simple to port/change, I'd think
twice.
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-27 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-27 10:45 Fco.J.Ballesteros [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-07 4:37 okamoto
2002-03-06 9:50 Roger Peppe
2002-03-05 17:29 forsyth
2002-03-04 14:33 Russ Cox
2002-03-04 14:02 nigel
2002-03-05 4:16 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-03-04 14:01 anothy
2002-03-04 13:35 anothy
2002-03-01 17:21 anothy
2002-03-04 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 22:30 bwc
2002-02-28 21:34 dmr
2002-02-28 18:56 David Gordon Hogan
2002-02-28 18:41 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-28 17:19 anothy
2002-03-01 10:03 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 15:22 presotto
2002-02-28 16:35 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-02-28 16:55 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 8:27 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-03-04 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-04 13:59 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-02-28 11:03 Bengt Kleberg
2002-02-28 16:41 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 0:54 ` Richard Uhtenwoldt
2002-02-27 14:19 presotto
2002-02-27 10:57 Bengt Kleberg
2002-02-27 11:10 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 10:26 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-28 10:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 21:05 forsyth
2002-02-26 20:28 presotto
2002-02-27 6:54 ` Eric Dorman
2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:51 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 13:27 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-27 14:20 ` Ish Rattan
2002-02-27 22:44 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 4:41 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-28 10:19 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:49 ` Matt H
2002-03-01 13:25 ` chad
2002-02-28 9:57 ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 14:55 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-26 20:25 Russ Cox
2002-02-26 19:05 presotto
2002-02-26 19:47 ` Mike Haertel
2002-02-27 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:29 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 12:21 ` Graham Gallagher
2002-02-27 12:59 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 21:07 ` Graham Gallagher
2002-02-28 9:57 ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 10:18 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 16:01 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-28 14:55 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-26 18:00 andrey mirtchovski
2002-02-26 14:30 rob pike
2002-02-26 14:25 rob pike
2002-02-26 14:24 rob pike
2002-02-26 17:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 17:44 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-27 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 17:48 ` Quinn Dunkan
2002-02-26 19:40 ` William Josephson
2002-02-26 11:24 geoff
2002-02-25 14:59 andrey mirtchovski
2002-02-25 14:41 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 14:39 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 14:34 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 17:25 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-25 17:54 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-26 10:26 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 10:27 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-02-25 1:30 okamoto
2002-02-22 13:29 rob pike
2002-02-22 13:43 ` plan9
2002-02-25 10:09 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-22 17:11 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-22 12:42 forsyth
2002-02-22 12:42 forsyth
2002-02-25 10:10 ` phaet0n
2002-02-22 11:30 sape
2002-02-22 9:58 phaet0n
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020227104607.CA57F19A9D@mail.cse.psu.edu \
--to=nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).