From: Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] List <-> News gateway?
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:17:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202272117.QAA26142@math.psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:28:53 +1300." <3.0.6.32.20020228082853.009b4ad8@pop3.clear.net.nz>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:46:26PM -0500, Dan Cross wrote:
> > Here's a question; how many people read comp.os.plan9 versus how many people
> > are on 9fans? The issue has been raised that comp.os.plan9 and 9fans have
> > very different spirits, and should, perhaps, be divorced from one another.
> > What are people's opinions on this?
>
> How would you characterise the different spirits of the two groups, and
> what advantage would you see to either group in a split?
Well, I wouldn't necessarily say that they have two different spirits;
the issue was raised to me, not the other way around.
- Dan C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-27 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-26 17:46 Dan Cross
2002-02-26 23:58 ` paurea
2002-02-27 10:20 ` Sam Hopkins
2002-02-27 4:41 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 19:28 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-27 21:17 ` Dan Cross [this message]
2002-02-27 21:38 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-27 21:40 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-27 22:14 ` George Michaelson
2002-02-28 19:55 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-03-01 10:03 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 16:04 ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 9:58 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 7:17 ` Tomas
2002-02-27 10:21 ` [9fans] Re: [9 fans] " Anthony Mandic
2002-02-27 3:04 [9fans] " Russ Cox
2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:52 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 9:13 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-27 13:19 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-27 10:06 Roger Peppe
2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 13:41 Matt H
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202272117.QAA26142@math.psu.edu \
--to=cross@math.psu.edu \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).